11th Circuit Rules FCA Qui Tam Provisions Don't Violate Appointments Clause
The 11th Circuit ruled FCA qui tam provisions do not violate the Appointments Clause.
Why it matters: This clarifies constitutional boundaries for whistleblower suits, impacting litigation strategy under the False Claims Act. It confirms the continued viability of FCA enforcement tools in major fraud cases.
- Eleventh Circuit vacated a 2024 district court dismissal that treated qui tam relators as 'officers' needing presidential appointment.
- The court remanded the case to address additional constitutional challenges under the Take Care and Vesting Clauses.
- The ruling aligns with Fifth, Sixth, Ninth, and Tenth Circuit decisions supporting FCA qui tam constitutionality.
- In 2025, FCA recoveries hit a record $6.8 billion with nearly 1,300 qui tam cases filed, highlighting its enforcement importance.
On September 1, 2026, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit delivered a pivotal ruling on the constitutional validity of the False Claims Act's (FCA) qui tam provisions in United States ex rel. Zafirov v. Florida Medical Associates, LLC. The court held that qui tam relators are not 'officers of the United States' subject to the Appointments Clause, vacating a 2024 district court dismissal that had invalidated a whistleblower suit on those grounds.
This decision ensures that whistleblowers can continue to file FCA suits without the onerous requirement of presidential appointment, reaffirming the FCA's role as a crucial fraud enforcement tool. As noted by the Eleventh Circuit, "We hold that relators are not officers of the United States subject to the Appointments Clause."
The Eleventh Circuit remanded the case for further consideration of related constitutional questions involving the Take Care Clause and the Vesting Clause, illustrating that some Article II challenges remain unresolved.
This ruling aligns the Eleventh Circuit with previous decisions from the Fifth, Sixth, Ninth, and Tenth Circuits, which have similarly upheld the FCA’s qui tam provisions against Appointments Clause challenges. These consistent rulings across circuits provide clearer guidance for courts and litigants nationwide.
The importance of this ruling is underscored by recent FCA enforcement statistics. In 2025, recoveries under the FCA reached a record $6.8 billion, with nearly 1,300 qui tam cases filed, marking the highest filing volume to date. The 11th Circuit’s decision preserves the legal framework enabling such vigorous whistleblower activity.
For ongoing updates and analyses on this case and FCA litigation, follow insights from Mayer Brown, King & Spalding, and Mintz.
By the numbers:
- $6.8 billion — FCA recoveries in 2025
- 1,300 — Qui tam cases filed in 2025, the highest number recorded
Yes, but: While the Appointments Clause issue is settled for now, constitutional questions under the Take Care Clause and Vesting Clause remain pending at the district court level.
What's next: The district court will next address constitutional challenges under the Take Care Clause and Vesting Clause, leaving some FCA-related constitutional issues unresolved.