ICBA Sues OCC Over Crypto National Trust Bank Charters

3 min readSources: National Law Review

ICBA sued the OCC on Oct 2, 2026, over national trust bank charters for crypto firms.

Why it matters: This lawsuit challenges the OCC's authority and the regulatory framework for crypto firms as banks, impacting legal and compliance guidance in banking and cryptocurrency sectors.

  • ICBA filed the lawsuit on October 2, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.
  • The suit contests the OCC's March 2, 2026, final rule and Interpretive Letter No. 1176 permitting crypto firms national trust bank charters.
  • ICBA alleges the OCC exceeded statutory authority by allowing crypto companies to engage in substantial non-fiduciary activities under bank charters.
  • The lawsuit seeks to vacate the conditional national trust bank charter granted to Protego Holdings Corp. in February 2026.

On October 2, 2026, the Independent Community Bankers of America (ICBA) filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia challenging the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency's (OCC) issuance of national trust bank charters to cryptocurrency companies.

The complaint specifically targets the OCC’s final rule issued on March 2, 2026, along with Interpretive Letter No. 1176, which collectively clarify the OCC's position allowing crypto firms to obtain national trust bank charters for substantial non-fiduciary activities. ICBA alleges these actions exceed the OCC’s authority under the National Bank Act.

The ICBA seeks a court declaration that the final rule and Interpretive Letter are unlawful and void. It also requests the court vacate the conditional approval granted in February 2026 to Protego Holdings Corp., one of at least 13 crypto firms to receive such charters from the OCC since 2018.

Rebeca Romero Rainey, ICBA President and CEO, stated, "The OCC's decision to allow companies to obtain national trust bank charters to conduct substantial non-fiduciary activities exceeds the authority Congress granted the agency. American consumers reasonably expect a federally chartered bank to carry federal protections. Digital assets held at a crypto firm operating under a national trust charter do not carry those important safeguards."

The lawsuit stresses that crypto firms under these charters are not subject to the same regulatory framework as traditional banks. They lack obligations under the Community Reinvestment Act, consolidated supervision, capital and liquidity standards, and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) insurance. Historically, the OCC has never chartered national banks that neither accept deposits nor perform fiduciary duties, nor has it managed an uninsured bank receivership in nearly 100 years.

Since the Trump administration, the OCC has conditionally approved 21 national trust bank charters, including at least 13 issued to crypto firms, intensifying debates over integrating digital asset companies into the conventional banking system.

By the numbers:

  • 21 — national trust bank charters conditionally approved by the OCC since 2018
  • 13 — of those charters issued to cryptocurrency firms
  • February 2026 — Protego Holdings Corp. received its conditional national trust bank charter

What's next: The lawsuit's progress in the U.S. District Court for D.C. will be closely watched for its impact on OCC regulatory authority and crypto banking approvals.