New Guide Helps Corporate Legal Leaders Navigate EU AI Act Compliance

3 min readSources: National Law Review

A new practitioner's guide offers practical steps for corporate legal teams to ensure EU AI Act compliance.

Why it matters: The EU AI Act imposes strict obligations and hefty fines on companies using AI systems within the EU. Legal leaders need clear, actionable guidance to steer their organizations through evolving rules and avoid penalties.

  • The EU AI Act takes effect in August 2024 with phased enforcement through 2027, targeting AI providers and deployers inside and outside the EU.
  • Non-compliance may trigger fines up to 8 million or 7% of global turnover, whichever is higher.
  • High-risk AI systems, including those in employment and biometric ID, face stringent requirements like conformity assessments and post-market monitoring.
  • The guide advises legal teams to establish governance, maintain AI system inventories, conduct risk assessments, and ensure transparency measures.
  • Erik Prusch, ISACA CEO, warns AI compliance will be like 'SOX on steroids,' highlighting complexity and scale.

The practitioner's guide for the EU AI Act equips corporate legal leaders with essential strategies to align their organizations with the world's first comprehensive AI regulation. The EU AI Act (Regulation 2024/1689) enforces its provisions starting August 2024, with phased implementation through 2027.

The legislation applies broadly to providers and deployers of AI systems operating within the EU or whose systems impact EU users, extending its reach to global corporations. Non-compliance carries severe penalties, including fines up to 8 million or 7% of global turnover, per industry analysis.

The Act segments AI systems into four risk tiers: prohibited, high-risk, limited-risk, and minimal-risk. High-risk systems—used in critical areas like employment, credit, and biometric identification—face rigorous obligations, including conformity assessments, requiring technical and quality management documentation, human oversight, and ongoing monitoring.

The guide highlights necessary steps for legal leaders: building governance structures, cataloging AI systems with clear risk classifications, risk assessment processes, and instituting transparency measures. A phased timeline stipulates that high-risk system requirements fully apply by August 2, 2026, while prohibited practices and AI literacy mandates come into force as early as February 2, 2025.

As Erik Prusch, CEO of ISACA, observes in an industry interview, complying with the AI Act will challenge businesses far more intensely than previous regulations like Sarbanes-Oxley, underscoring the critical role legal teams play in effective organizational risk management amid this evolving regulatory landscape.

By the numbers:

  • €8 million — maximum fine for EU AI Act non-compliance
  • 7% of global turnover — alternative cap on fines for breaches
  • August 2024 — EU AI Act enters into force
  • August 2, 2026 — full enforcement of high-risk AI system obligations begins

What's next: Legal leaders should prioritize compliance roadmaps ahead of August 2024, focusing on governance and risk assessments as phased requirements roll out through 2027.