DLA Piper Faces April 2026 Trial for Pregnancy Discrimination
DLA Piper faces trial in April 2026 for allegedly firing a pregnant associate.
Why it matters: This case underscores the legal and reputational stakes for firms in handling employee discrimination claims, emphasizing the need for robust HR practices.
- Mehta v. DLA Piper trial starts April 2026 in New York.
- Anisha Mehta claims she was fired during her pregnancy.
- DLA Piper argues her dismissal was due to subpar work.
- Contradictions in rationale highlighted by her bonus and responsibilities.
The upcoming trial of Mehta v. DLA Piper is raising concerns within the legal community regarding the management of employment discrimination cases. Anisha Mehta, who held a senior position in DLA Piper’s intellectual property division, asserts that the firm terminated her employment in 2022 while she was six months pregnant, following her request for maternity leave.
DLA Piper maintains that Mehta's termination was performance-related, despite evidence from court documents showing inconsistencies in this claim. These documents highlight her receipt of recent raises and bonuses, as well as her significant client-facing responsibilities.
This legal battle unfolds in the wake of the 2023 Pregnant Workers Fairness Act, which aims to enhance protections for pregnant employees. The outcome of Mehta's case could not only reshape internal policies at law firms nationwide but also influence public perceptions about how firms manage discrimination allegations.
Yes, but: DLA Piper's claims of poor performance are countered by Mehta's recent professional accolades.
What's next: Observations from this case could lead to changes in HR practices across law firms.